PDA

View Full Version : Columnist axed after taking cash to promote Bush plan


Viper
01-10-2005, 06:04 PM
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Tribune Media Services will stop distributing columns written by conservative commentator Armstrong Williams because he received money to promote President Bush's education programs, the company said.

Meanwhile, the nation's largest African-American journalists' organization has asked other media outlets that use Williams' work to do the same.

Williams confirmed Friday that he received $240,000 from the Department of Education in exchange for promoting No Child Left Behind, the centerpiece of Bush's education agenda. Williams said the payment was merely for advertising time.

The department defended the deal, claiming its public-relations contractor "sought avenues to reach minority parents."

"The contract paid to provide the straightforward distribution of information about the department's mission on No Child Left Behind, a permissible use of taxpayer funds under legal government contracting procedures," according to a department statement.

The National Association of Black Journalists also called on the White House to rebuke the department's employees.

In a statement, the group of 4,000 members called on all broadcast and print media that carry Williams' work or use him as a commentator -- a group that includes CNN -- to "drop him immediately."

"I thought we in the media were supposed to be watchdogs, not lapdogs," said Bryan Monroe, a vice president of the association. "I thought we had an administration headed by a president who took an oath to uphold the First Amendment, not try to rent it."

Williams is African-American, but NABJ said he is not a member of the organization.

Tribune Media Services, which distributes Williams' column, released a statement saying it was dropping him.

"Accepting compensation in any form from an entity that serves as a subject of his weekly newspaper columns creates, at the very least, the appearance of a conflict of interest," the company said. "Under these circumstances, readers may well ask themselves if the views expressed in his columns are his own, or whether they have been purchased by a third party."

Williams' failure to notify TMS of his receipt of the payments violates his syndication agreement, the company said.

Williams told CNN Friday that some might feel his actions were unethical, but "it was advertising."

Still, he acknowledged the appearance of impropriety.

Williams said his company taped a one-minute commercial with Education Secretary Rod Paige, and he had two one-minute commercial spots in Williams' shows. He said many of his affiliates do not use paid advertising, instead airing only public service announcements.

"He's lost his credibility," said Barbara Ciara, another vice president of the NABJ. "He's tainted fruit. And he's unfairly indicted all commentators who have their own independent opinion, don't need a script from the administration and don't need to be paid off."

Travis
01-10-2005, 06:25 PM
*waits for Mach/Heretic's response*

Bryan
01-11-2005, 02:42 AM
Corruption in the media should never stand unchallenged. I don't care if it's left leaning garbage or right leaning, it's equally bullshit.

Lord Worm
01-11-2005, 05:40 AM
Politics is equally bullshit. Pretty much the only true equality.

HereticPB
01-11-2005, 07:39 AM
If you write something supporting a Republican, their causes, or their ideals you are sure to get ridden hard by the Liberal Media and Liberals but on the flip side if a liberal columnist prints something while taking money from a liberal cause there is no story whatsoever. Hmm how can that be? (Well except CBS they got caught badly.)

And what’s with this Black Man keeping the Black man down crap? That is something new.

I do agree with the decision of the taking of his job. The pendulum in the media should stay in the middle and never swing to the left or the right.

Bryan
01-11-2005, 07:58 AM
That's exactly what I'm saying.

I don't need some jackass telling me what to think.

peasantlover
01-11-2005, 09:41 PM
I dont quite understand... did he write an article praising No Child Left Behind?? It seems to me from ^^^ that he did not do that, he simple appeared on a radio and\or tv commercial for it. i.e., Celebrity advertising. If thats the case, I dont see anything wrong with it..

I might be wrong tho, the article is kind of unclear..

Travis
01-11-2005, 10:21 PM
From what I've seen on the news, he was paid to write the article and stuff, but he didn't tell the audience he was paid. He also mentioned good things about it in some TV appearances.

The biggest problem is that he got the money from the DoE, meaning it was money from taxpayers. And it was like 240,000 dollars.

HereticPB
01-11-2005, 10:32 PM
The Presidents salary, the VP, the House members, and the Senate are paid by the taxpayers? So ??

peasantlover
01-12-2005, 02:41 AM
they are also elected.

Bryan
01-13-2005, 02:24 AM
I was just going to say that myself..

peasantlover
01-13-2005, 05:03 AM
Oh well, I tried to defend him, but I cant really. I was just saying if he was doing advertising: i.e., commercials, I dont think its a big deal. But if he was writing an article and potrayinging himself as a journalist, its no different than what Dan Rather did.

I also dont like tax money going to propoganda either..

Bryan
01-14-2005, 02:13 AM
Don't assume I'm a Dan Rather fan either.

Travis
01-14-2005, 04:42 AM
I'm not a fan of anyone in the media who lies to the public or accepts bribes, etc.

peasantlover
01-14-2005, 08:18 AM
Don't assume I'm a Dan Rather fan either.

?? where did I imply that? I didnt mean to.