View Full Version : Packers....wow
hehateme71
12-13-2004, 01:59 AM
wow, that game was awesome, I was slamming my fist to the ground every time we screwed up, which was just about every play for the first half. at half we were down 13-0, but came back to win on a field goal by ryan longwell 16-13, great game in the second half for favre and the defense. anyone else watch it?
twins15
12-13-2004, 02:11 AM
I hate football right now. :(
PacMan
12-13-2004, 02:35 AM
awwwriighhttt
I missed the second half, I'll try to see highlights tomorrow. I went to nfl.com expecting a loss but I saw 16-13 and I was like "woah omg" lol. We looked awful the first half.
NomarFan5
12-13-2004, 02:37 AM
Packers still suck. I mean.. hell they played the LIONS. And almost lost.
hehateme71
12-13-2004, 03:18 AM
heh yeah we suck yet were 8-5 and in the lead of the NFC north. do you think the vikings suck? I bet not since i think you just hate the packers
Magus Relmyn
12-13-2004, 03:21 AM
heh yeah we suck yet were 8-5 and in the lead of the NFC north. do you think the vikings suck? I bet not since i think you just hate the packers
Yeah, both the Packers and Vikings suck this season. Hell, the entire NFC sucks this year, except for the Eagles and Falcons (make all the excuses you want, but at the end of the day, they are 10-3 :)).
NomarFan5
12-13-2004, 03:23 AM
I bet I do too think the Vikings suck.. The NFC as a whole blows.. Eagles not included. Chargers > Packers.. and if you say no they arent.. let the records speak.. 10-3 in the tough AFC.. vs 8-5 in the horrible NFC.
hehateme71
12-13-2004, 03:24 AM
lol I still do not understand why the falcons are that good, I mean there only good player is keith brooking.....he he
Magus Relmyn
12-13-2004, 03:28 AM
I bet I do too think the Vikings suck.. The NFC as a whole blows.. Eagles not included. Chargers > Packers.. and if you say no they arent.. let the records speak.. 10-3 in the tough AFC.. vs 8-5 in the horrible NFC.
Uh, the Chargers play in the AFC.
Also, to hehateme, ever heard of a guy called Rod Coleman? He only has 8.5 sacks in 10 games, and had an INT for a TD today. :) ;)
NomarFan5
12-13-2004, 03:29 AM
Uh, the Chargers play in the AFC.
I know this. I was saying that the Chargers are better then the Packers.
hehateme71
12-13-2004, 03:36 AM
yes yes we know that, your acting like I dont know that lol. yes the chargers are on another level, the packers would be a pretty damn good team if we actually had a defense better than the indiana hoosiers
NomarFan5
12-13-2004, 03:37 AM
yes yes we know that, your acting like I dont know that lol. yes the chargers are on another level, the packers would be a pretty damn good team if we actually had a defense better than the indiana hoosiers
haha.. i agree on that one. they do need to revamp their d.
Magus Relmyn
12-13-2004, 03:46 AM
yes yes we know that, your acting like I dont know that lol. yes the chargers are on another level, the packers would be a pretty damn good team if we actually had a defense better than the indiana hoosiers
The defense isn't the problem -- well, in a way it is, but it's mostly that suspect secondary. When Al Harris is your starting corner, that's where you have a problem.
hehateme71
12-13-2004, 03:57 AM
it is also are LB's, today it was ridiculious, nick barnett had a problem, every time he made a play he would do a dance, even when they gained yards! pissed me off, but back to why the lb's suck nick barnett I fell is horrible, nail diggs was out, we had to start paris lenon, and are DL arent the greatest, only KGB, and jackson are pretty good, but we need someone else besides hunt, he just has to many missed tackles and penalties, but yes the secondary is a huge huge problem.
Magus Relmyn
12-13-2004, 04:00 AM
it is also are LB's, today it was ridiculious, nick barnett had a problem, every time he made a play he would do a dance, even when they gained yards! pissed me off, but back to why the lb's suck nick barnett I fell is horrible, nail diggs was out, we had to start paris lenon, and are DL arent the greatest, only KGB, and jackson are pretty good, but we need someone else besides hunt, he just has to many missed tackles and penalties, but yes the secondary is a huge huge problem.
Nick Barnett is a ****ing beast. I'd excuse him for one, maybe two, bad plays. :)
McMaster
12-13-2004, 04:09 AM
Why can't Detroit hang on for the win!! Vikings chances getting smaller!!!
hehateme71
12-13-2004, 04:27 AM
magus you think barnett is good>? you have to be kidding me, he is the worst LB I have seen on are team in a while, well starting LB, he never does anything right, and no this is not about 4th and 26, this is about this year and last year together.
Magus Relmyn
12-13-2004, 04:31 AM
magus you think barnett is good>? you have to be kidding me, he is the worst LB I have seen on are team in a while, well starting LB, he never does anything right, and no this is not about 4th and 26, this is about this year and last year together.
Yeah, I would kill to have Barnett on my team. He has excellent speed. Besides, it's not like you said he's the only Packers LB missing tackles, since you said Diggs is also blowing tackles.
I'll cut the kid some slack, since he did have 112 tackles, 2 sacks, and 3 INTs last year. :)
hehateme71
12-13-2004, 04:35 AM
well you dont see all the stuff he screwed up on the stats do you? all are problems on D last year were from him, is int's they were luck, trust me all three were tiped up. yes alot of tackles, thats because the only thing he has is speed
Magus Relmyn
12-13-2004, 05:25 AM
well you dont see all the stuff he screwed up on the stats do you? all are problems on D last year were from him, is int's they were luck, trust me all three were tiped up. yes alot of tackles, thats because the only thing he has is speed
I'd still take him on my team. :)
hehateme71
12-13-2004, 05:30 AM
well yeah I can see why other people would want them on there team lol, you dont get to see every packer game you just see his stats lol, if you could see every game you would pay this guy to get off of your team
Magus Relmyn
12-13-2004, 05:38 AM
well yeah I can see why other people would want them on there team lol, you dont get to see every packer game you just see his stats lol, if you could see every game you would pay this guy to get off of your team
I get to see the Packers play in my region every ****ing week. Fortunately for me, I have NFL Sunday Ticket, so I usually don't have to watch them. I can tell you right now though, most of the Packers blame on defense should be directed towards Diggs and Diggs only.
HocChe
12-13-2004, 09:23 PM
That game was very fun. I almost hit my head on the ceiling from jumping up and down(I have a pretty low ceiling).
dachamps
12-13-2004, 09:29 PM
wow, that game was awesome, I was slamming my fist to the ground every time we screwed up, which was just about every play for the first half. at half we were down 13-0, but came back to win on a field goal by ryan longwell 16-13, great game in the second half for favre and the defense. anyone else watch it?
I have to disagree that was not a awsome game(I had $on the Lions,real $)Oh well it was only 5$.The punting was hideous in the game also but i give props to the packers nice job , nice comeback..I'm never betting against them again *nod*
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.