PDA

View Full Version : PSM2 article on PS3(NO 56KB WARNING!!!)


Sephiroth_VII
12-23-2004, 08:19 PM
Here is an article on the PS3.
For the article on the PSP, go to the PSP boards.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v604/Sephiroth_VII/ps3i.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v604/Sephiroth_VII/ps3ii.jpg

text version:
Sony confirm PS3 will be ten times more powerful than PS2 and cause online networks 'to explode'. What's going on?
S3 will launch in 2006, powered by the long rumoured Cell processor technology that offers ten times the performance of PS2.The announcement was made at a recent press conference about Cell chip technology, with Sony's Chief Operating Officer Ken Kuturagi predicting that the chip - and hence PS3 - will "spark an online revolution. In the future, all forms of digital content will be converged and fused on to the broadband network, and will start to explode", he mused. In real words, that means PS3 will be able to connect via broadband to other consoles across the world - or even other Cell chip equipped electrical devices- and create one pulsing hive-mind of processing power. Well, that's the theory.
At the heart of this electronic revolution will be the Cell chip - an ultra powerful processor, or the 'brains' of PS3, produced in conjunction with Toshiba and IBM.We'll spare you the rea//ydetailed technical waffle, but - look away now technophobes-the Cell chip is a 64-bit
processor core from IB/vYs Power family. The chip can be used as part of a larger parallel processing environment, and will be able to run multiple operating-and realtime resource management-systems at once. Basically, PS3 will be able to 'talk' and share power with other Cell equipped devices, likeyour HDTV, DVD playeror -this isonlytheoretical-fridgefreezer. Why? God knows - but we're sure it'll make graphics look lovely. Or mean you can order a pint of milk while chatting to your Japanese buddies during an online gang war in CTA4.
Theonlyfigure we (sort of) understand is that the Cell chip will be capable of 16 trillion floating point calculations per second - over ten times existing processor technology. That's big. IBM confirmed that the chip would begin production in the second half of 2005, neatly coinciding with Sony's announcement that they would 'commercialise'Cell-based products in 2006 - ie. turn them into PS3. Expect further Cell chip details at February 2OO5's International Solid State Circuits
Conference - it's a cmckerof an event, folks-and for PS3 to beannounced at the end of 01 2005, the end of Sony's financial year.The PS3 will make its public debut at E3 2005 in May, with development kits shipped from October. A key stumbling block may be PS3's mooted adoption of the Blu-Ray storage system (a high capacity storage device that replaces DVDs).Why? Major Hollywood film studios Universal Pictures and New Line Cinema åre backing a (technically inferior but easier to use/ control) rival storage system called HD-DVD. Sony may end up in the middleof a potentially ruinous format war (like Betamax and VHS in the early '8os), and find PS3 unableto play the latest Hollywood films.
IBM will start produdng ihe Cell processor in early 2005 and a working version of PS3 will be shown off next May, Afull launch ofthe console is not expected until 2006, however, if Sony can come to an agreement with the movie studios, PS3 wili be multimedies evofved. The future's bright, the future's exploding.

There is proplem with the text, i know that.
I use a program to convert the scan, and it's not that good :(

oxygenuk
12-23-2004, 08:51 PM
v intresting :shock: , thanks for the scan

Sephiroth_VII
12-23-2004, 09:20 PM
v intresting :shock: , thanks for the scan
You know, i'm sorry it couldn't be a better quality scan, but sadly the database that i use won't let my upload higher sizes than 250 kb :(

Domination
12-23-2004, 09:27 PM
"Sony confirm PS3 will be ten times more powerful than PS2 and cause online networks 'to explode'. What's going on?
S3 will launch in 2006, powered by the long rumoured Cell processor technology that offers ten times the performance of PS2.The announcement was made at a recent press conference about Cell chip technology, with Sony's Chief Operating Officer Ken Kuturagi predicting that the chip - and hence PS3 - will "spark an online revolution. In the future, all forms of digital content will be converged and fused on to the broadband network, and will start to explode", he mused. In real words, that means PS3 will be able to connect via broadband to other consoles across the world - or even other Cell chip equipped electrical devices- and create one pulsing hive-mind of processing power. Well, that's the theory."

I wonder was that a typo. The last time I checked, the Cell-based television was around that number. Hmm....

Alejux
12-23-2004, 09:34 PM
"The CELL chip is going to do over 16 trillion floating-point operations per second, and will be 10x more powerful then the PS2!"

- Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf, Iraqi Minister of Information -

Domination
12-23-2004, 09:52 PM
That's my point. It doesn't make since unless they were applyng it to something else. Oh well, I guess we'll just have to wait and see.

gaming ultima
12-23-2004, 10:10 PM
its psm2, they don’t know what there talking about most of the time
and wow its been a while since i posted on these boards
does anyone even remember me?

ultimategamer2004
12-23-2004, 10:20 PM
Yeah i would agreee with that but most of it seems like a pretty good read. and in response to Demand for psp is around 25% higher than DS I arnt surprised that thats the case seen how nice the psp is! 8) :lol: :D :roll:

Ironlungz
12-23-2004, 10:22 PM
"The CELL chip is going to do over 16 trillion floating-point operations per second, and will be 10x more powerful then the PS2!"

- Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf, Iraqi Minister of Information -

No way!

Just in floating point calculations...

PS2 - 6 billion operations per sec. (6.16 gflops). According to the article PS3 - 16 trillion operations per sec. (16 tflops). Thats at least 1000X more operations per sec.[/quote]

Alejux
12-23-2004, 10:27 PM
I know. The article is complete nonsense. Either the guy was drunk, or he didn't have a clue of what he was talking about. Maybe both.

Sephiroth_VII
12-23-2004, 10:36 PM
its psm2, they don’t know what there talking about most of the time
and wow its been a while since i posted on these boards
does anyone even remember me?

I remember you from reading through old threads.
Welcome back Ultima :D

ultimategamer2004
12-23-2004, 10:38 PM
sorry ultima dident see your post and yes i remember you from a while bac.. you remember me?

megadrive
12-23-2004, 11:21 PM
this article is pure trash. they are pulling the 16 trillion floating point operations a second (16 Tflops) figure from what the future cell-based workstations will be able to achieve. And those workstations will only be able to achieve a theoretical 16 Tflops by using multipul cell processers in parallal. 16 Tflops is *not* what a single Cell processor can do. not even a highend Cell processor, and not what the PS3's Cell-CPU will do. The article makes absolutely no sense at all.

If PS3-CPU could push 16 Tflops, it would be more than 2000x as powerful as the EE-CPU in PS2. this is just not going to happen with PS3. btw, I am predicting PS3 Cell CPU to be in the area of 512 Gflops. that's half a Tflop.


thanks for posting the article. though. fun to read. and laugh.

megadrive
12-23-2004, 11:29 PM
btw, this FIVE+ year old Next-Gen/EDGE article on PS3 makes alot more sense, dispite it being very outdated, and dispite at least one major mistake (66 trillion polygons when it should be 66 billion)

http://img111.exs.cx/img111/5751/ps319sa.jpg
http://img111.exs.cx/img111/9094/ps327zv.jpg

Brandon
12-23-2004, 11:47 PM
That article is utter crap...

The GPU being developed by NVIDIA isn't even finalised yet. I now feel dumber having read that. It's obviously all BS. And that logo is fake, so...

senas8
12-24-2004, 12:03 AM
its psm2, they don’t know what there talking about most of the time
and wow its been a while since i posted on these boards
does anyone even remember me?
LOL about psm2
What happend to 1000 times or atleast 700 times? :roll:

Maxcre8
12-24-2004, 12:34 AM
didn't they say the PS3 will be 100times the speed of a PS2.. not 10 :|

I know you can't just say 299Mhz (ps2) x 10 = 2990Mhz (ps3)
I remember to read 1 cell chip is 4,.. Ghz

but 4Ghz is nog very much right? ok it's big for a console.. but if the ps3 have to stay 10 years like the ps1.. hmm

Z
12-24-2004, 12:35 AM
Well you actually wasted more than half that. You could have easily scanned only the text. That way it would be much clearer, but thanks anyway.

Can you give the name of that mag? I saw PSM in there, if I am not mistaking. ( yes, I had to read from the pic, now I am so dizzy I don’t even remember my name. O_o


P.S. such info have designated threads. it would be much better and useful to post such info in them
:wink:

Domination
12-24-2004, 03:09 AM
this article is pure trash. they are pulling the 16 trillion floating point operations a second (16 Tflops) figure from what the future cell-based workstations will be able to achive. And those workstations will only be able to achive a theoretical 16 Tflops by using multipul cell processers in parallal. 16 Tflops is *not* what a single Cell chip can do. not even a highend Cell chip, and not what the PS3's Cell-CPU can do. the article makes absolutely no sense at all.

If PS3-CPU could push 16 Tflops, it would be more than 2000x as powerful as the EE-CPU in PS2. btw, I am predicting PS3 Cell CPU to be in the area of 512 Gflops. that's half a Tflop.


thanks for posting it though. fun to read.

This is true. I believe that was known as a Cell rack. I'm really not sure how he came up with these answer when none of them makes much of any sense at all. Maybe he was an outsider looking to get some attention.

julps31
12-24-2004, 07:04 AM
didn't they say the PS3 will be 100times the speed of a PS2.. not 10 :|
I know you can't just say 299Mhz (ps2) x 10 = 2990Mhz (ps3)
I remember to read 1 cell chip is 4,.. Ghz

but 4Ghz is nog very much right? ok it's big for a console.. but if the ps3 have to stay 10 years like the ps1.. hmm
Yeah I wouldn't trust them. Plus 4ghz is not small. As a matter of fact thats a number were hoping for. Thats all we need really to last us a good five years with the Cell processor. The number I would expect they got 10x from would be the FLOPs rating. I know that if anything would be more than 10x faster in the PS3 than in the PS2 it would be the FLOPs rating. So I wouldn't trust that number until we get the PS3's system specs.

PlayBoy
12-24-2004, 03:57 PM
I'm greatly annoyed by that ugly fake PS3 logo still used in some places :twisted: :evil:

The_One
12-25-2004, 08:31 AM
That article is utter crap...

The GPU being developed by NVIDIA isn't even finalised yet. I now feel dumber having read that. It's obviously all BS. And that logo is fake, so... Agreed.

@gaming ultima: Welcome back to PSiNext buddy ;). I still remeber you from the good 'ol days.