PDA

View Full Version : Microsoft meets Brussels deadline


Fats
06-01-2005, 01:04 PM
US software giant Microsoft has met a 1 June deadline for responding to a landmark European Union antitrust ruling against the company.

"We have submitted proposals and we are awaiting a response from the EU Commission," a spokesman said.

In 2004, Brussels found Microsoft guilty of abusing its market dominance and fined it 497m euros ($655m; £340m). If the EU considers Microsoft's response to have fallen short, it could hit the firm with daily fines of $5m.

"Contacts continued between the European Commission and Microsoft until late last night, and the Commission will now carefully analyse what's on the table," a spokesman for the Commission said.

EU regulators would now assess "whether or not we consider that Microsoft has complied with the March 2004 decision", he said. The 2004 ruling focused on Microsoft's behaviour in two key markets: servers, the computers which sit at the heart of networks, and media software.

The European Commission told Microsoft that it would have to open up its core software systems to rivals, making it easier for them to build products which would work with its Windows operating system.

It also ordered Microsoft to provide a version of Windows without its own Windows Media Player, to give rival software makers a chance to compete and computer makers the option to supply PCs with the media software of their own choosing.

The EU has the power to fine Microsoft up to 5% of its daily global turnover for each day that the antitrust ruling is not applied to its satisfaction. The 1 June deadline was set for Microsoft to submit a final plan on how it would comply with the ruling.

If unhappy with the initial response, the EU would have to send a formal notification to Microsoft, giving the company about 10 working days to respond. On Tuesday, an EU spokesman said antitrust regulators would probably make a decision on whether or not to hit Microsoft with fines by the end of July.

Source (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4598473.stm)

Viper
06-01-2005, 05:28 PM
Why is this not happening in America?

I want a Windows free of IE and WMP.

Coded-Dude
06-01-2005, 05:55 PM
Because M$ and the American government are sleeping together.
They get a secure OS while the public OS is plagued with security holes so Uncle Sam can check up on you. :wink:

Linux - live free or die

the legendary ice man
06-01-2005, 11:15 PM
The EU is a fair-trade union thingy.

Stuff has to be fair.

Dunno why, but I really want Microsoft to have the fine imposed on them. It should hopefully teach them better business practices and maybe they'll stop having so many *^%$&^%&*($)U££ security problems.

Gegenki
06-02-2005, 03:14 AM
[quote="the legendary ice man"]
Dunno why, but I really want Microsoft to have the fine imposed on them. quote]

Becuase they take the p*ss
They have a crappy OS yet squeeze out the comptition so you have nothing to chose from anyway

The_One
06-02-2005, 04:54 AM
Because M$ and the American government are sleeping together.
They get a secure OS while the public OS is plagued with security holes so Uncle Sam can check up on you. :wink:
Linux - live free or die Actually... I "heard" that the XP has a backdoor which Microsoft implemented so they can check up on you... I don't know if this is true though :roll:.

the legendary ice man
06-02-2005, 09:19 AM
They aren't allowed to use that under EU regulations - from what I know.

Dunno about America. Countries should spend more on combatting Microsoft than the billions they spend on stopping drug trafficing.

Coded-Dude
06-02-2005, 05:29 PM
Because M$ and the American government are sleeping together.
They get a secure OS while the public OS is plagued with security holes so Uncle Sam can check up on you. :wink:
Linux - live free or die Actually... I "heard" that the XP has a backdoor which Microsoft implemented so they can check up on you... I don't know if this is true though :roll:.

I think they've been doing it longer than that, but hey....were talking conspiracy theories now.
Of course spyware, and adware do that too! :evil:

One reason I avoid Windows at all costs :wink:
If Microsoft made a better product, I might not hate on `em so much, but there are TOO many financial decisions.
If they thought about the end-user overall experience, and not how much more money they could squeeze out of their software, then I would change my tune.

the legendary ice man
06-02-2005, 06:20 PM
The main reason Windows is around is because large companies were paid to sell PC's with Windows 95 and 3.1 on.

Which, even at the time was illegal - a cartel I belive...


EDIT::

The EU seem pleased with the initial look.