PDA

View Full Version : The Appropriate Response.


makeitlookreal
05-13-2006, 09:59 PM
(Please do not delete this topic, because if a downright insulting (but I do not consider truly attacking) article can be posted on the front of E-mpire then this should be allowed too.)


CPIASMINC,

I will say that was creative, funny, and original. Let me also say that you are a good writer!

I disagree with the content however. I STRONGLY disagree.

The truth of the matter is that some of us realize we as consumers need to let the manufacturers of products we may possibly purchase know exactly what we want. In the end will it actually matter? Probably not, but it very well could if enough of us with money to spend speak loudly enough!

Obviously, we all want great graphics. However, it seems some of us are suddenly reluctant to even politely urge game designers and companies to do their very best to make supurb looking games. For goodness sakes, if a company releases a target render the least we should do is continue peacefully commenting that we *really* hope they will reach it or our dollars, yen, and euros might be spent by the company that can produce a product of that quality!

CPIASMINC, please let me admit a few things to you. I am not an overly gifted person, good looking, or overly intelligent. In fact, my cranium is folically challenged! But I am NOT a child.

The truth of the matter is that a young child accepts just about any toy he or she is given and does not critically examine it. For goodness sakes, my best friend's three year old son climbs to the top of the entertainment center to play with the XBox and Gamecube games. He will climb up there and grab the games he loves! However, he doesn't put them in a console. He holds them up, tosses them about a bit, and then proceeds to chew on them. One day he loudly proclaimed the game he loved by lifting it into the air, boldly proclaiming the bite marks he put on it, and saying as only a three year old can, "Daddy! I got Duke Boy's! I got the Duke Boy's!"

An adult recognizes the worth of a product and decides if it is worth his or her hard earned money. The worth of a product to every person is different, but to some of us a game is not worth very much unless the graphics are superb! If they are not up that level of quality we will simply let those other consumers who are happy with whatever developers happen to release and call the "latest and greatest" buy the games we don't want!

I'm not a child and don't have a problem with reality. The fact of the matter is that with the PS3 great graphical effects are possible and that has been made clear this E3. We have seen great backgrounds, we have seen some great looking realistic characters, and we have seen great looking special effects in games. But very few have been able to bring all of these various elements together, at least so far!

I know you are a developer or are close to the developing community. Quite frankly, I am impressed with the knowledge individuals such as yourself have accumilated. It takes an extensive knowledge of computing, coding, programming, artistry, story telling, and more to create a game. So when I suggest that a game does not look up to the standards I want it to please don't take that as a personal insult.

First of all, any developer knows much more than myself about the details of game making. I honestly have confidence that with the power of the PS3 you guys can pull off at lot more than what we have seen so far.

Secondly, I am only giving my opinion and the truth about how I plan to spend my dollars as a consumer. I am not your boss, your master, or some punk forcing you to do anything. But if the games don't meet the quality I want the truth is that I will simply not buy them.

Thirdly, the comments are just as much directed to the companies financing these games to encourage them to give YOU GUYS the resources that are needed to make the best games possible. Perhaps they need to PAY you guys more so that you can focus more on the game and less on the bills sitting at home. Additionally, maybe they need to hire a few more of you guys so perhaps the games could be made with wide awake people instead of people going through sleep depravation? Finally, could it be the company is not spending enough on the game? If they want us to buy it they need to spend what it takes!

You may not like my suggestions or the fact I am willing to demand only high quality visually realistic games to spend my dollars on. Indeed, the more individuals such as myself that exist to purchase only the best looking titles the less popular and financially rewarding easier to create games will become. It is even possible that smaller gaming companies may go out of business if powerful consoles eventually make realistic games more common place. Personally, I don't wish lack of employment of financial hardship on anyone but this is a free market and if the personal choices of myself and others force certain gaming companies to shape up or shutdown then it is simply a natural economic process for the industry.

I do not have disease, a mental disfunction, or a complete loss of sanity as you have suggested. The fact is that myself and others have high standards when it comes to the games we want to purchase is only a sign of maturity and being a very savy consumer. We are not deluded by thinking the PS3 or any other current console will make perfection, true 100% pixel perfect photorealism, or a "real-world" simulator. But we are determined to remain confident if the resources are utilized in the form of time, talent, manhours, and cold hard cash that supurb games equal to any prerendered "target" of last E3 can indeed be produced in real-time.

The innovations that create the substance of "next-gen" won't be brought about by those who are only willing to work for those things that are easy to achieve and reasonable to expect, but by those who will surge forward to accomplish the feats considered difficult by all. This is the reason why we demand the best and are not willing to accept the mediocre!

Additionally, in a competitive industry such as this one if a company knows that a sub-par game can reap the same profits as one that took more money and resources to produce they will sacrifice the quality of the product in a heartbeat. Obviously, they are not having a powwow in the middle of the desert plotting how they are going to cheat the consumer. But it makes perfect business sense to give the LEAST to get the MOST back. If they think that by giving LESS in game quality they can just just as much or MORE back they WILL INDEED DO SO.

Now, this is where people like myself come in. I personally hope that if enough people such as myself peacefully, politely, and nicely make it heard across the internet that we will only accept the best and mediocre graphics are NOT enough to satisfy us that game companies will produce better products. This is not ridiculous, insane, or stupid. It is a reality, but will only have a measurable effect when enough people start speaking their mind and letting the collective voice of their wallets echo loudly across the gaming world!

I need to clear up one more issue here. I have nothing against other styles of games that are not intended to be realistic, but I am simply not interested in them myself. For those that love animated games or simply don't mind games with a lower quality of graphics I urge you to spend your dollars however you see fit on the consoles and game titles that will make you personally happy! But if you are not satisfied with the quality so far of a title in progress, the quality of an already released title, or with the specifications of a console please speak up! Sony, Microsoft, Nintendo, or any game developer you can name does NOT pay your bills! You owe them absolutely nothing and will be doing them a favor by purchasing their products. If there is something you see needs to be changed please be bold enough to be a keen consumer and ASK! They don't have to do anything at all. It is their company and their products. But as a consumer if you speak up and others follow the same path it will make a difference. However, remember to back up your words by letting them know you have dollars that might be spent on their products.

CPIASMINC, please realize that consumers have a right to speak up about such issues. Of course you have the right to be upset if that is your choice, and you don't even have to listen to them. But people have the right to speak their minds JUST AS MUCH when they are making a CRITICISM as when they are PRAISING a product. They should be not be hateful, rude, or downright disrespectful but their opinions are just as valid.

Amazing realistic graphics are possible this generation. High quality CHARACTERS, EFFECTS, and high quality BACKGROUNDS at the SAME-TIME are not pipe-dreams. They will take time, manpower, talent, resources, and money. But it is now obvious that much of what YOU claim is impossible to believe in, irrational to consider, or insane to expect is indeed VERY possible! Is it a 100% certainty? Of course not! But there have been enough graphical examples of sheer aw this early on in the life of the PS3 to encourage me and others to urge others to produce the *best* they can! And in doing so we can expect at *least* much more than we have seen so far!

In conclusion, the future is coming and if we boldly but politely demand the best and don't fear offending someone by in a nice way urging them to produce the best product possible then we will have a true NEXT-GEN gaming age much, much sooner!

CPIASMINC, you seem like a good person, an intelligent person, and a talented person. I wish you the very best in all of your game developing efforts, but I can't say that I appreciate the content of your article on E-mpire. If you truly think you have a counter point to offer on exactly why with current technology a certain ammount of realism or graphical perfect is not possible please share it by an attempt to educate us with the vast knowledge you possess. However, your response makes me think that the demand for beautiful and graphical supurb games has actually hit a more personal nerve ending. Your a great write and the article was funny, but I believe many of us could see through it. I have tried to be polite and reasonable in this response, and hope that I have not said anything personally rude or hateful to you.

Best wishes for your future success and happiness.

Makeitlookreal

yoshaw
05-13-2006, 10:34 PM
Didn't read a word. But ZOMG get a life ok.

;) no offense! lol

Infernal
05-13-2006, 10:54 PM
Lock this and please stop posting insanely long and pointless complaint threads/posts MILR.

makeitlookreal
05-13-2006, 10:55 PM
I am not offended at all Yoshaw. I always appreciate your posts and those of CPIASMINC. You don't have to read it if you don't want too. I am also not *really* offended by CPIASMINC. I am just strongly disagree with him and don't like the tone he used, but he has the right to post whatever he wants as long as it is not a downright personal threat which it obviously WAS NOT!

makeitlookreal
05-13-2006, 10:56 PM
Why should this thread be locked after the content of his article was allowed to be posted on the very front of E-mpire in which he accused others and myself of being brainless, insane, delusional, and so fourth! If his is valid for posting on the FRONT PAGE OF THE SITE then this has every right to be here!

VG Aficionado
05-13-2006, 10:59 PM
I haven't read that post either (nor I read any of his posts anymore), but I think we all agree that you, MILR, are an overly obsessed individual. You act like you have too much free time and as if you have a worrisome lack of a real life with both its problems and worthwhile experiences, and that's not a good thing regardless how you're making us all feel towards you. And I can tell you it's not good.

On the behalf of our forum members, if I may, I ask you to stop making these threads and stop posting like you have been lately. We don't care about most if not all you're talking about, we really don't.

Infernal
05-13-2006, 11:02 PM
MILR, CPI's article was supposed to be a funny joke. Not meant to be taken literally, and quite honestly everything he said in that article was the truth. Yes the truth is harsh sometimes but it was the truth nonetheless. Some people (including you) are expecting way too much out of next-gen and are complaining constantly when your not getting what you expect, you need to learn to be happy with what you get and stop complaining, save your expectations for PS4 or even PS5 from the things you seem to expect.

makeitlookreal
05-13-2006, 11:09 PM
Infernal,

I don't believe that what he had to say was the truth. It is obvious to me if you read the article I just wrote that he has personal feelings involved, and my posts have hit a nerve. I am not trying to offend anyone, but just trying to give my honest opinions and in the process urge people to politely demand the best products for their dollar.

Additionally, you should not always be happy with what you get if the truth is something better is indeed possible. Complacency is what ruins many people's lives. There is a time for stability and consistancy, and that is a good thing, but then again there is also a time to strive for greatness.

Finally, if any of you read his article (I now realize some of you have) it was funny but at the same time VERY insulting to anyone who simply demands high quality games and the very best products possible for their dollar. And at times he went beyond good humor to becoming downright DISGUSTING at moments. I am not angry at him and I still think he is a good person. But if he can write that then I have the right to post a response on this forum if THAT can be on the front page.

Nameless
05-13-2006, 11:10 PM
Makeitlookreal, I reviewed your looong post and overall agree with your thoughts. The only comment I have is it will take time to fully exploit the power of the next-gen consoles. Overall you have the power of the consumer and I would agree only purchase what you feel is a quality product.

Honestly I just think some people on the forum get frustrated with your comments regarding visuals, but we should respect the opinions of all... Peace

makeitlookreal
05-13-2006, 11:13 PM
Additionally, unlike some of you if I don't see something I want because the quality is not there I don't instantly buy "something" just to "have" what is offered at the time. I don't know about all of you, but I am willing to sell or give away my PSP because I am no longer interested in it and wait until the PS4 if the PS3 does not produce the games I desire. However, I honestly believe that more likely I will have to wait a couple years after launch.

At the launch is when I will make my decision. If the games are not there at the time I will just leave the whole gaming thing for a couple year while hopefully people see the TRUE power of the PS3 that they could of had sooner if they had demanded it in a nice, polite, and peaceful way.

makeitlookreal
05-13-2006, 11:15 PM
Nameless,

Thank you very much for the kind and thoughtful response. It is very much appreciated. I did my very best and spent a lot of time on that post trying to express my feelings as articulately as possible while being careful to explain myself in such a way to show I want great graphics, but at the same time I am not personally against anyone at all, and even think a lot of CPIASMINC even though I didn't like that particular article of his.

Thanks again!

yoshaw
05-13-2006, 11:23 PM
but I am willing to sell or give away my PSP because I am no longer interested in it

Ok, know that I claimed it first!!!! PM me the details and I'd pay for the shipping. Thanks :cheers:

PS: Not to be taken as a nudge or push to keep on posting like a retard. You need to stop that regardless of giving me a PSP for free. ;)

makeitlookreal
05-13-2006, 11:44 PM
Yoshaw,

My younger brother is getting married soon, moving to another state, and I have been thinking about giving it to him. Even though I am not in great financial shape he is going to be in much, much worse shape getting married to a disabled wife on an income of $8.00 dollars an hour and I think he would like it as a present. I apologize if my post made it sound like I was throwing it up for anyone to claim like I did not already have any plans. Sincerely, and with everything else put aside, I do apologize for that. I have been considering giving it away or selling it, and if I gave it away it would probably go to him. Again, I apologize.

cliffbo
05-14-2006, 12:33 AM
MILR you are wearing me down i don`t know why i`m compelled to read your posts but unfortunately i do,even though after doing so i feel like i`ve gone twelve rounds with tyson. now i`m going to relax with a tonic and maybe a valium.

yoshaw
05-14-2006, 12:39 AM
LOL!

I hear ya loud n clear cliffbo. :laugh:

woundingchaney
05-14-2006, 12:42 AM
Im not sure what the problem is here????

This is reasonably hard to understand.

Are you upset by PS3 visuals or by the editorial by Cpiasminc. Surely you werent under the impression that these cgi and target renders were going to be gameplay. There is many aspects to a game graphics is just one of them (although arguably the most important one). If graphics mean so much why even play games, you should simply download cgi cutscenes all day.

I can assure you Im a graphics whore but in the end I was a gamer first.

Nameless
05-14-2006, 12:57 AM
Wounding, Well said...
For the first time I can say I completey agree with your entire post!

jaxmkii
05-14-2006, 01:33 AM
Everone Stop Sucking Now!

Viper
05-14-2006, 01:37 AM
Perhaps you should first play Fight Night 3 and Tiger woods that you so regard the graphics upon. That seems to be epitome of gaming for you. If both of those games do not appeal to you or they are not that fun for you then isn't that telling you something? That great graphics simply don't make the game fun by themselves.


As I said before. Wanting the best graphics is not a problem at all, it's the denial of anything less that is a problem.

LaLiLuLeLo
05-14-2006, 01:54 AM
Yeah exactly. That game might be fun but the graphics suck! (by his imaginary lala land standards, which means the graphics are at the very least serviceable) is a very shallow, and, imo, idiotic philosophy.

makeitlookreal
05-14-2006, 01:56 AM
Viper,

Apparently, you find it easier to criticise people like myself than to get the courage to ask for better looking games. Yes, I like the look of Fight Night and the Tiger Woods demo, but at the same time I realize that if developers were willing to do so we could have MORE games that look just as high quality. Unlike yourself, I am willing to stand up and state when I think games need to look better because they are clearly not up to par, but have the potential to be so much more graphically!

Also, your post had a hugely illogical statement in it. Quite frankly, there is a difference between having great graphics and just average gameplay than having great graphics and no gameplay but a smiling face. What do you think I am? A blathering idiot? I know for a fact that one character standing still is not at all a game! But what I have been trying to say for a while is that personally I think graphics are more important to me as an individual consumer than gameplay, but it is not a GAME if there is hardly no gameplay at all! Both GREAT graphics and GREAT gameplay are perfectly compatible if the game makers are willing to do the work.

---

Woundingchaney,

I was indeed upset with his editorial. As I have said before I do think it was funny and well-written. But at the same time I strongly disagree with the content and found parts of it to be offensive, but then again he has the right to say what he wants. The truth is however, that if he can call people like me stupid, dumb, rectal, idiots, and go on and on about how we need mental help and so fourth then I can post a non-insulting post like this without anyone threatening to have it deleted or closed!

It is so much easier for all of you to try and SHUTUP someone that you simply disagree with than to recognize they have an opinion too and the right to express it. Unless I have done otherwise, I don't feel I have insulted anyone in a realistic way or a joking way. Unlike CPIASMINC which I am NOT "angry" with at all, but wrote a very insulting editorial. I totally support his right to publish it, but if so I sure have the right to write this too!

Additionally, if someone posts a target render or a clip of a game I am darn sure going to say something if the game does not look like it is going to reach the quality of it. Do they have to listen to me? Nope. But I sure will say something! Honestly, I did not know if Motorstorm or any other game would reach the quality of their demos. But *personally* I believe that no gamemaker should ever post any advertisement or demo of a game that is not real-time. I am NOT saying that we should make a law restricting their rights to do whatever they desire. It is their business of course! But *personally* I find it very misleading and distasteful!

I want realistic GAMES. If it is a GAME then it has GAMEPLAY. All I am saying is that if developers had to choose between great graphics and great gameplay (which they do NOT have to at all but may choose to do so to reduce production costs so they can sell an inferior product but make more money) I would personally rather have lesser (but not non-existant) game play.

Smokey
05-14-2006, 02:00 AM
man you gotta say MGS4 looks pretty sweet & someone posted a quote by the makers that it will look better again! im glad i dont play pc games since this is what you seem to be basing your comparisons on, me i play ps2 so its gonna be a LEAP for me :) & you cant say its not going to be a leap over that??

LaLiLuLeLo
05-14-2006, 02:08 AM
Viper,

Apparently, you find it easier to criticise people like myself than to get the courage to ask for better looking games. Yes, I like the look of Fight Night and the Tiger Woods demo, but at the same time I realize that if developers were willing to do so we could have MORE games that look just as high quality. Unlike yourself, I am willing to stand up and state when I think games need to look better because they are clearly not up to par, but have the potential to be so much more graphically!

The courage to fight for better graphics? You're batshit loco my man. You're not fighting for some higher ideal here, you're whining about the visual aesthetics of a video game! YOU HAVE UNREALISTIC EXPECTATIONS. Plain and simple.
What do you think I am? A blathering idiot?

Well......the general consensus is...


I was indeed upset with his editorial. As I have said before I do think it was funny and well-written. But at the same time I strongly disagree with the content and found parts of it to be offensive, but then again he has the right to say what he wants. The truth is however, that if he can call people like me stupid, dumb, rectal, idiots, and go on and on about how we need mental help and so fourth then I can post a non-insulting post like this without anyone threatening to have it deleted or closed!


someone link me to this editorial I missed it. Is it it's own thread or within another thread?

It is so much easier for all of you to try and SHUTUP someone that you simply disagree with than to recognize they have an opinion too and the right to express it. Unless I have done otherwise, I don't feel I have insulted anyone in a realistic way or a joking way. Unlike CPIASMINC which I am NOT "angry" with at all, but wrote a very insulting editorial. I totally support his right to publish it, but if so I sure have the right to write this too!

Perhaps. But you go on and on and ON about what you think is actually relevant after it's been made explicitly clear that it isn't! Again I say, YOU HAVE UNREALISTIC EXPECTATIONS. Games will not magically leapfrog past the latest standard in CG. The fact that they're as close as they are and so soon, for that you should be greatful/excited.


Additionally, if someone posts a target render or a clip of a game I am darn sure going to say something if the game does not look like it is going to reach the quality of it. Do they have to listen to me? Nope. But I sure will say something! Honestly, I did not know if Motorstorm or any other game would reach the quality of their demos. But *personally* I believe that no gamemaker should ever post any advertisement or demo of a game that is not real-time. I am NOT saying that we should make a law restricting their rights to do whatever they desire. It is their business of course! But *personally* I find it very misleading and distasteful!

I.....SHUTUP!

I want realistic GAMES. If it is a GAME then it has GAMEPLAY. All I am saying is that if developers had to choose between great graphics and great gameplay (which they do NOT have to at all but may choose to do so to reduce production costs so they can sell an inferior product but make more money) I would personally rather have lesser (but not non-existant) game play.

Foolish boy.

Smokey
05-14-2006, 02:11 AM
here LaLiLuLeLo2003 i think this is it??
The courage to fight for better graphics? You're batshit loco my man. You're not fighting for some higher ideal here, you're whining about the visual aesthetics of a video game! YOU HAVE UNREALISTIC EXPECTATIONS. Plain and simple.
this is too true :)

http://psinext.e-mpire.com/index.php?categoryid=4&m_articles_articleid=550

kagai
05-14-2006, 02:18 AM
Surely you werent under the impression that these cgi and target renders were going to be gameplay.

And whose fault is this if someone does believe these videos? It's not the consumer, it's the companies that put out this misleading propoganda. We may know better, but what about the poor noob that comes across a couple of these videos, runs out and buys the system based upon those videos and is disappointed?

This has been going on too long and I believe tha we should follow Europe and enact legislation (that expands upon Europe's) that forces companies to note in any advertisements (or any type of media) the system the media is from, whether it is actual gameplay, or cgi and any other relevant information. A level of accountability needs to be forced upon these companies to prevent Joe Consumer from being mislead (or falsely heightening their expectations) by viewing these various media. I think it is long overdue.

makeitlookreal
05-14-2006, 02:28 AM
Kagai,

I am totally against legislating this issue. The last thing we need is more government being involved in yet another issue. Personally, I believe companies hae the right to do whatever they want and never even use a real-time clip of footage at all if that is what they decide. However, I will also say that I find it distasteful and misleading. They need out of sheer good-will and honesty to stop using CGI and post only real-time clips for advertising. If their game is so great then in my opinion they don't need to use CGI to advertise it because the in-game graphics will be good enough!

Basically, I agree that something needs to be done, but not another law to violate a companies right to run it's affairs how it sees fit. Personally, I think a boycott of such companies might work or perhaps a petition. But the last thing I want to do is get the government involved.

makeitlookreal
05-14-2006, 02:41 AM
LaLiLu,

Yes, I am more than willing to expend energy to rally for better looking games. If I am going to spend $600 dollars on a console and $50-$60 dollars a pop for games they better be of the quality I expect, or simply I will be a savy consumer and not purchase them.

Obviously, gaming is not some noble cause or a higher ideal. I had higher ideals once and put my energy into other areas that actually have true meaning, but the longer I live the more I realize the world is ran by powerful, greedy, and monstrous people that have far more resources than you or myself. Every major issue in the world that needs fixing has just about been settled by the powers that be in THEIR favor even if it screws the rest of humanity. I don't believe in one huge conspiracy (not that none exist) but that there a various groups of powerful people and powerful companies that want to keep that power and wealth. To do so, they have to maintain the status quo and keep things basically the same on this planet. That is why we are still burning fossil fuels and using internal combustion engines just like we did 100 years ago (among other things). Abundant, clean, cheap, and portable energy is the number one thing this world needs and it is not going to happen anytime soon.

Basically, I had so many noble ideas and tried to rally people and educate people and get the truth out about a variety of topics that were really important. But I watched and saw how so little progress was made in each area due to the powers that be, dogmatic scientists, and the lack of the ordinary person to *do* anything (much less accept that some things they have been taught all their life are wrong).

So right now, my only goal is to get enough money to get my own place, get away from the stress I currently live in, and live a comfortable peaceful life. I don't know exactly how I am going to do that so in the meantime this occupies my time.

Hey, I am an honest and open person. I don't mind if you know aspects of my life. I have no reason to hide the truth.

By the way, I don't have unrealistic expectations. I have seen what is possible with my own eyeballs. The truth is that much more is possible (because it has already been done) but the various pieces of things that have been done need to be brought together to make something even better.

kagai
05-14-2006, 02:43 AM
Kagai,

I am totally against legislating this issue. The last thing we need is more government being involved in yet another issue. Personally, I believe companies hae the right to do whatever they want and never even use a real-time clip of footage at all if that is what they decide. However, I will also say that I find it distasteful and misleading. They need out of sheer good-will and honesty to stop using CGI and post only real-time clips for advertising. If their game is so great then in my opinion they don't need to use CGI to advertise it because the in-game graphics will be good enough!

Basically, I agree that something needs to be done, but not another law to violate a companies right to run it's affairs how it sees fit. Personally, I think a boycott of such companies might work or perhaps a petition. But the last thing I want to do is get the government involved.


No company has the right to mislead consumers and, obviously as this same issue has been going on for years, they aren't going to police themselves. Do you really think drug companies would place disclaimers in their ads if it wasn't for regulation. Now, I'm not calling for regulation, but I do belive that the consumer (especially the average consumer) shoud be protected and the only way that is going to happen is if it is legislated that all media be noted with basic, truthful information so the buyer can make an informed decision.

julps31
05-14-2006, 02:46 AM
MILR..let me ask you a question. Have you seen the trailer for Wardevil?

http://forums.e-mpire.com/showthread.php?t=56403

Go on over and watch that...and if your not impressed by that. I suggest you stop playing games for the next 6-7 years.

And Lmao @ your sig.

woundingchaney
05-14-2006, 04:07 AM
---

Woundingchaney,

I was indeed upset with his editorial. As I have said before I do think it was funny and well-written. But at the same time I strongly disagree with the content and found parts of it to be offensive, but then again he has the right to say what he wants. The truth is however, that if he can call people like me stupid, dumb, rectal, idiots, and go on and on about how we need mental help and so fourth then I can post a non-insulting post like this without anyone threatening to have it deleted or closed!

It is so much easier for all of you to try and SHUTUP someone that you simply disagree with than to recognize they have an opinion too and the right to express it. Unless I have done otherwise, I don't feel I have insulted anyone in a realistic way or a joking way. Unlike CPIASMINC which I am NOT "angry" with at all, but wrote a very insulting editorial. I totally support his right to publish it, but if so I sure have the right to write this too!

Additionally, if someone posts a target render or a clip of a game I am darn sure going to say something if the game does not look like it is going to reach the quality of it. Do they have to listen to me? Nope. But I sure will say something! Honestly, I did not know if Motorstorm or any other game would reach the quality of their demos. But *personally* I believe that no gamemaker should ever post any advertisement or demo of a game that is not real-time. I am NOT saying that we should make a law restricting their rights to do whatever they desire. It is their business of course! But *personally* I find it very misleading and distasteful!

I want realistic GAMES. If it is a GAME then it has GAMEPLAY. All I am saying is that if developers had to choose between great graphics and great gameplay (which they do NOT have to at all but may choose to do so to reduce production costs so they can sell an inferior product but make more money) I would personally rather have lesser (but not non-existant) game play.


I dont believe that I try to shutup people and if you do so than I apologize. If infact you havent noticed I have argued for approx a year now against the PS3 ability to meet such ridiculous gameplay graphics especially for first generation games, for the very reason that its ridiculousness like this that spawns from such misleading marketing. Where have you been for the last decade, this is exactly what sells systems what sells games what a billion dollar industry thrives on PRESENTATION. I have listened to how supposedly the RSX and Cell are such extremely powerful pieces of hardware that anything is possible and all these Sony presentations are realtime showing gameplay footage, how 360 visuals are horrid when compared to the awesome might that is the PS3. I have had the same course in nearly all my posts here and I honestly dont believe I ever intended to shut anyone up. Its completely understandable why you are under these impressions but at the same time there has been adequate information available that you should of never expected such things. Why is this affecting your life to such an extent. Its a gaming console or a hobby we all enjoy perhaps you should re-evaluate your philosophy on gaming in general - it isnt about Sony NIn or MS it isnt about Halo or MGS its about enjoying a leisure activity by yourself and/or with friends and family (do you really need flawless graphics to enjoy a game?).

Im going to give you a hint. The PS3 is an excellent console and has very impressive titles that will only improve with time, but dont expect gameplay to match cgi, dont expect large corperations not to mislead you, play what you enjoy but dont sit around waiting on a commercial. Is this your first E3 experience??

There are quite a few things Im disappointed with after the outcome of E3 although there is much more Im looking forward to.

Just play games man dont play companies or presentations.



Oh and Real Time is not an accurate indication of what gameplay will look like either (it is however and indication of the gaming engine).


COMPANYS HAVE THE RIGHT TO SHOW WHATEVER THEY WISH - USE YOUR RIGHT TO QUESTION WHAT THEY SHOW.

satriales
05-14-2006, 04:17 AM
COMPANYS HAVE THE RIGHT TO SHOW WHATEVER THEY WISH - USE YOUR RIGHT TO QUESTION WHAT THEY SHOW.
Here in the UK the advert for COD on the 360 was forced to be edited to include a message saying it was not ingame footage. Games are no longer allowed to show CG trailers on TV without making it clear that the actual game doesn't look like that.

masteratt
05-14-2006, 04:18 AM
Oh come on guys! Why isn't this locked yet? I can't believe this has been allowed to go this far.

woundingchaney
05-14-2006, 04:21 AM
Here in the UK the advert for COD on the 360 was forced to be edited to include a message saying it was not ingame footage. Games are no longer allowed to show CG trailers on TV without making it clear that the actual game doesn't look like that.
No doubt never heard of this one, I dont think that this is practiced here in the states but its been quite a while since I have seen a game commercial.

masteratt
05-14-2006, 04:30 AM
In US, as long as the advert doesn't claim it is Actual In-Game Footage, they can show CGI.

In UK however, the ASA (Advertising Standards Authority) are much stricter.

Game adverts are lacking in comparison to damn insurance adverts....

Nameless
05-14-2006, 04:31 AM
Masteratt, amen to that!! Shut this worthless thread down...

Nameless
05-14-2006, 04:34 AM
The courage to fight for better graphics? You're batshit loco my man. You're not fighting for some higher ideal here, you're whining about the visual aesthetics of a video game!
This has got to be the quote of the day, priceless.
(+Rep for you, LMAO)

Viper
05-14-2006, 05:00 AM
Ok, this one has run its course.

Batshit loco, lmao.