Zeep
06-19-2006, 05:29 AM
a club i'm in at school was cleaning up for the end of the year and found it. it's from roughly 2000, based on the dates of the files on it. it's mac os 8.6, it's got like a 1GB hard drive and like 50MB ram or something retarded like that. it's pretty amusing. i'm gonna see if I can load OS X on it. the wedgie mouse in the pics was taken (read: stolen shamelessly) from my school computer lab.
any suggestions as to what i should do with it? i would have posted this from it, but i don't have a spare ethernet cable lying around, so i haven't been able to hook it up.
the one thing i've noticed is that it's a little bit slower than my other old laptop, which is windows XP. that one's only 2 or 3 years old, but it's been loaded up with all sorts of crap, and it's really shitty. however, this one, which is clearly less powerful, is only a BIT slower. what i've realized is that although it's slow, becuase it's so old, it still seems like it runs exactly as it was intended to when it was made, which is something that can't be said for any windows comp i've owned. maybe next time it need to replace my computer... nah, i could never... *muses*
pics:
http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/5505/10030264gs.th.jpg (http://img136.imageshack.us/my.php?image=10030264gs.jpg) http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/2527/10030277gw.th.jpg (http://img99.imageshack.us/my.php?image=10030277gw.jpg) http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/3623/10030293mz.th.jpg (http://img136.imageshack.us/my.php?image=10030293mz.jpg) http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/6857/10030304qe.th.jpg (http://img209.imageshack.us/my.php?image=10030304qe.jpg)
any suggestions as to what i should do with it? i would have posted this from it, but i don't have a spare ethernet cable lying around, so i haven't been able to hook it up.
the one thing i've noticed is that it's a little bit slower than my other old laptop, which is windows XP. that one's only 2 or 3 years old, but it's been loaded up with all sorts of crap, and it's really shitty. however, this one, which is clearly less powerful, is only a BIT slower. what i've realized is that although it's slow, becuase it's so old, it still seems like it runs exactly as it was intended to when it was made, which is something that can't be said for any windows comp i've owned. maybe next time it need to replace my computer... nah, i could never... *muses*
pics:
http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/5505/10030264gs.th.jpg (http://img136.imageshack.us/my.php?image=10030264gs.jpg) http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/2527/10030277gw.th.jpg (http://img99.imageshack.us/my.php?image=10030277gw.jpg) http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/3623/10030293mz.th.jpg (http://img136.imageshack.us/my.php?image=10030293mz.jpg) http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/6857/10030304qe.th.jpg (http://img209.imageshack.us/my.php?image=10030304qe.jpg)