1987 ST 162 Celica.

[aman]

1987 ST 162 Celica. Low Km's (135k) Full service history. All for 5.8k, could probably haggle down to 5.6/7. Worth it or not?



heres the linky...

http://www.carsales.com.au/used-cars/private/TOYOTA/CELICA/details.aspx?PriceMax=7500&__Nne=20&__N=85%2042%20443%20834%20285%20257&seot=0&State=South%20Australia&silo=1003&state_id=85&distance=25&Cr=17&__sid=110FADF742B5&R=1440758&__Ns=pCar_PrivateSpecialFlag_Int32%7C1%7C%7CpCar_I mageCount_Int32%7C1%7C%7CpCar_LastModifiedDate_Dat eTime%7C1&__No=20&trecs=226

[The Dude]

Wait..

wait...

1987...

$5,600....

Unless its a E30 M3...


and it clearly looks like a common stock pig Toyota...


HELL NO!

[seahorse]

australian dollars.

[goku2057]

is that like 5 bucks US? That's the only way I'd say yes.

[speed stick]

Honestly I don't see that being that great of a deal. Maybe if it had a turbo. But still, its 20 years old. Being that old even if it is in excellent shape, its still gonna need more work then you know.

[Xer0]

IF it was an earlier RWD celica, maybe, or even a later AWD. But thats FWD if im not mistake, so no. Buy a newer imprezza or protoge for that money.

[aman]

ok thanks for the help guys.

btw^ an impreza/ Protege is way outta my price range. Most decent impreza's/protege's will cost at least 10k, probably more.

[masonite]

keep in mind that at the end of the day, you're buying a 20 year old car, and all the problems that come with it. Even if it's well maintained, there's still 20 years of wear on every part (except the injectors, it seems ;) ).

a more modern car, even if it doesn't look as "sporty" will undoubtedly have better reliability, probably more power, and probably a better chassis. depending on what size car you're looking for, most modern big sixes will go for under ten, up until about early 2000's. Try a commodore up to VX, or falcon up to AU.